The Referee Commission reviewed the disputed moments from the 30th round of the First MFL, and brought the following conclusions:

At the match Fk. Bregalnica - Fk. Shkupi played on 30.04.2022, were analyzed

situations of 4, 47, 58, 74, 80 and 88 minutes

“Main referee: Jovan Kachevski. Assistant referee: Razme Bakracheski and Dragan Trpcevski.

4th minute: GOOD ASSESSMENT OF THE MAIN REFEREE (NO penalty awarded from 11 meters)

A player from the attack on Bregalnica had the ball in his possession and shot towards the goal of Shkupi, the kicked ball hit the player of the defense of Shkupi who was in the space of 5.5 meters, in its box. Correct decision of the referee to continue the game, the ball hit the player in the chest (not in the hand).

47th minute: GOOD ASSESSMENT OF THE MAIN REFEREE (11-meter kick).

A player from the attack on Bregalnica had the ball in his possession in the box of Shkupi, in the moment he passed the ball to his teammate, the ball hit the hand that was in unnatural position (wide apart from the body) the player from the defense of Shkupi. Correct decision of the referee, awarded a kick from 11 meters without disciplinary measure.

58th minute: GOOD ASSESSMENT OF THE MAIN REFEREE (He awarded a shot from 11 meters)

A player from the attack of Shkupi received a ball about 20 meters central from the goal of Bregalnica and went to the goal, a player from the defense of Bregalnica started pulling the striker before he entered in the box and continued two meters in the box, where the player fell. Correct decision of the referee, awarded a penalty kick from 11 meters and a disciplinary measure yellow card for pulling.

74th minute: GOOD ASSESSMENT OF THE MAIN REFEREE (NO penalty awarded from 11 meters)

A player from Shkupi had the ball in the side of Bregalnica's goal and crossed it towards the goal, a player from the defense of Bregalnica made a sliding start to block the ball, however, the ball hit him in the arm, which was resting on the ground and at shoulder height. Right decision of the referee to continue the game, because the hand at the kick was in natural position and did not increase body volume.

Correct decision of the referee, awarded a free kick and a yellow card which was second for the player was automatically given a RED CARD.

88th minute: GOOD ASSESSMENT OF THE MAIN REFEREE (11 meter kick)

A player from the attack on Bregalnica centered the ball towards the goal of Shkupi, wanting to block the ball from the player from the defense of Shkupi made a sliding start in his box, the ball hit him in the arm which was raised high and in an unnatural position. Correct decision of the referee, awarded a penalty kick from 11 meters without disciplinary measure (it was not a shot on goal, but sideways from the goal).

The referee of this match had many challenging situations, and the same judged correctly, the criteria equal for both teams.

At the match Fk. Shkendija - Fk. Rabotnicki played on 30.04.2022, it was analyzed

the situation of 54 minutes

Main referee : Igor Ivanov. Assistant referee: Kushtrim Lika and Petar Novachev.

54 minutes: GOOD ASSESSMENT OF THE MAIN REFEREE (11 meter kick awarded)

A player from the attack of Shkendija received a ball in the 16th minute of Rabotnicki, with a dribbling got rid of a player from Rabotnicki's defense and at the moment when he wanted to shoot towards the goal was pulled by the hand with intensity, ie it was prevented from kicking and fell. Correct decision of the referee, awarded a penalty kick from 11 meters and a disciplinary measure yellow card for pulling.

On the match Fk.Macedonia - Fk.Akademija Pandev played on 01.05.2022,

the situations in 6, 16 and 84 minutes were analyzed

Main Referee: Dimitar Pileshkov. Assistant referee: Kristijan Dzonov and Riste Gjorgjiev

6 minutes: GOOD ASSESSMENT OF THE MAIN REFEREE (11 meter kick awarded)

A player from the attack of Macedonia was in possession of the ball in the 16th minute - Akademija Pandev to the left of the goal, with a player (knee in the thigh area) starting the defense of the Pandev Academy. Correct decision of the referee, awarded a shot from 11 meters without disciplinary measure (the start is lateral to the goal and the ball goes to the side).

16th minute: GOOD ASSESSMENT OF THE MAIN REFEREE (NO penalty kick awarded 11 meters)

After a corner kick for Akademija Pandev, the ball hits a player from the defense of Macedonia in the area of ​​the leg and arm (which are joined at the moment of impact) is natural position. Correct decision of the referee, to continue the game, there are no elements for a shot from 11meters.

84th minute: GOOD ASSESSMENT OF THE MAIN REFEREE (11 meter kick awarded)

A player from the attack of Macedonia received the ball in the penalty box - the scorer of Akademija Pandev sideways from the goal, on it started with intensity in the lower part of the leg a player from the defense of Pandev Academy. Correct decision of the referee, awarded a penalty kick from 11 meters without disciplinary action measure (the start is lateral to the goal).

At the match Fk. Renova - Fk. Struga Trim Lum played on 01.05.2022, analyzed

are the situations in 55 and 90 + 2 minutes

Main referee: Marjan Stojanovski. Assistant referee: Slagjan Markovski and Filip Itskovski.

55th minute: GOOD ASSESSMENT OF THE MAIN REFEREE (Awarded second yellow - red card)

A player from Renova's attack was in possession of the ball and in a promising action of about 25 meters sideways from the goal of Struga Trim Lum, a player from the defense of Struga started on it and committed an offense by completing the promising action. Correct decision of the referee, awarded Free kick and a second yellow card to the player, automatically was given a RED CARD.

At the match Fk.Borec- Fk.Skopje played on 01.05.2022, were analyzed situations of 32, 82 and 90 + 4 minutes.

Main referee: Kiril Smokvoski. Assistant referee: Zoran Kostoski and Ile Misheski.

32 minutes: CORRECT ASSESSMENT OF THE MAIN REFEREE (NO penalty kick awarded 11 meters) In the penalty box of Skopje, the ball was in the air, and while lowering it hit his hand (which was in natural position) the player from the defense of Skopje, in continuation of this attack had situation sideways in the penalty box, a player from Borec had the ball in his possession and on it with minimal contact without intensity started a player from the defense of Skopje. Correct decision to the referee in both situations the game to continue, there are no elements for a shot from 11 meters. Only in the second situation is a yellow card given for simulation (exaggeration of contact to force an impact of 11 meters)

82 minutes: CORRECT ASSESSMENTOF THE MAIN REFEREE (NO penalty kick awarded)

A player from Skopje had the ball in his possession and shot towards the goal of Borec, a defense player of Borec in his box made a sliding start to block the shot and the ball hit the player in the arm that was leaning on the ground at shoulder height (natural position). Correct decision of the referee to continue the game, no elements for a shot from 11 meters, hand in natural position.

90 + 4 minutes: CORRECT ASSESSMENT OF THE MAIN REFEREE (NO penalty kick awarded from 11 meters)

A player from the attack on Skopje was in possession of the ball a little sideways in the penalty box of Borec, a player from Borec's defense started on it with minimal intensity.

Correct decision of the referee, the game was stopped (indirect free kick ) and awarded a yellow card for simulating an attacker.

Referee analysis for the 25th round of the SECOND MFL - WEST

At the match Fk. Sileks - Fk. Teteks played on 30.04.2022, it was analyzed

the situation of 84 minutes

Main referee: Misho Gjorgjievski. Assistant referee: Goran Baleski and Osman Zekiri.

40 minutes: GOOD ASSESSMENT OF THE MAIN REFEREE  (11 meter kick awarded)

A player from Sileks kicks the ball from a corner kick, it goes to a teammate in the penalty box. Teteks sideways from the goal, started on it with a sliding start without touching the ball player from Teteks defense and shot down the attacker. Correct decision of the referee, awarded a kick by 11 meters without disciplinary measure.

At the match Fk.Voska- Fk.Vardar played on 30.04.2022, the situation was analyzed

from 90 + 1 minute

Chief referee: Igor Stojcevski. Assistant referee: Daniel Vasilevski and Martin Petkovski

90 + 1 minute: GOOD ASSESSMENT OF THE MAIN REFEREE (NO penalty kick awarded 11 meters)

A player from Voska's attack centered the ball in the 16th minute of Vardar, the ball was not in possession, two players from both teams went on it, there was minimal contact and no intensity. Correct decision of the referee to continue the game, because the contact is minimal and insufficient for an impact of 11 meters.

Referee analysis for the 25th round of the SECOND LEAGUE - EAST

At the match Fk. Pobeda - Fk. Belasica played on 30.04.2022, it was analyzed

the situation of 61 minute

Main referee: Aleksandar Stavrev. Assistant referee: Dejan Kostadinov and Goce Petrevski

61 min: GOOD ASSESSMENT OF THE MAIN REFEREE (AWARDED FREE SHOT OVER GOALKEEPER-GOAL CANCELED)

Pobeda player centered in the penalty box of Belasica, the goalkeeper of Belasica before catching the ball with his hands in the goal area of ​​5.5 meters, was blocked by a player from the attack of POBEDA by grabbing the goalkeeper by the hand in a jump, committing a foul on the goalkeeper, and then scored. Correct decision of the referee, the goal was annulled and a free kick was awarded to the goalkeeper.

OF THE OTHER MATCHES IN THE SECOND LEAGUE WEST AND THE SECOND LEAGUE EAST THERE WERE NOT SITUATIONS FOR ANALYSIS.