The Referee Commission reviewed the disputed moments from the 28th round of the 1st MFL and made the following conclusions:

- At the match FC Borec - FC Struga Trim Lum played on 16.04.2022, the situations of 25, 76, 90 and 90 + 2 minutes were analyzed.

Main referee: Joseph Burton; Assistant referee: Daniel Vasilevski and Aleksandar Gjorgjevski;

25th minute: Correct assessment of the referee (non-awarded kick from 11 meters).

A player from Struga, Trim Lum, in his own box, breaking the ball with his foot, accidentally hits it in his own hand, which is in a natural position. Correct decision of the referee to continue the game, because there are no elements for a shot from 11 meters.

76th minute: Correct assessment of the referee (penalty kick from 11 meters).

A player of Borec centered the ball next to a teammate in the Struga penalty area, the teammate who was in promising action before hitting the ball with his head, was knocked down from behind by a Struga player. Correct decision of the referee, kick from 11 meters and disciplinary measure yellow card for pushing (promising action).

90th minute: Correct assessment of the referee (penalty kick from 11 meters).

A player from Borec's attack was in possession of a ball sideways in the Struga penalty area, the Struga defender from behind wanted to kick the ball with intensity and hit the attacker in the leg. Correct decision of the referee, kick from 11 meters without disciplinary measure.

90 + 2 minutes: Correct evaluation of the referee (red card awarded).

A player of Borec was in possession of the ball, a player of Struga was pulling the player of Borec by the jersey who, in order to get away, hit the player of Struga in the face area with his elbow and great intensity. Correct decision of the referee for a free kick and a red card.

- On the match FC Macedonia - FC Rabotnicki played on 16.04.2022, the situations from the 12th and 44th minute were analyzed.

Main Referee : Dimitar Pileshkov; Assistant referee: Risto Gjorgjiev and Kristijan Dzonov;

12th minute: Correct assessment of the referee (no free kick).

A player from Rabotnicki had the ball in his possession about 20 meters from his goal, a player from Macedonia with a sliding start took the ball away from him without having contact and elements for a free kick. The player scored a goal, a correct decision of the referee that allowed the game to continue.

44th minute: Correct assessment of the referee (no penalty kick is awarded).

A player from Macedonia was played in the penalty area of ​​Rabotnicki without possession of the ball. Rabotnicki, a defender of Rabotnicki, started pushing (pushing) a defender from behind him with minimal intensity, the Macedonian player wanted to use that contact to force a shot from 11 meters. Correct decision of the referee to continue the game, because the contact is minimal and insufficient for a shot from 11 meters.

- At the match FC Renova - FC Academy Pandev played on April 17, 2022, the situations from the 34th and 73rd minute were analyzed.

Main referee: Igor Ivanov; Assistant referee: Sladjan Markovski and Martin Petkovski;

34th minute: Correct assessment of the referee (no 11-meter kick is awarded).

A player from the attack of Akademija in the penalty area of ​​Renova, was in possession of the ball and shot towards the goal of Renova. Renova defender made a slippery start blocking the shot and the ball hit him in the area under the armpits and arm. Correct decision of the referee to continue the game because there is no playing with hand.

73rd minute: Correct assessment of the second assistant referee (awarded offside position).

Centered ball from a Renova player to a teammate, who hit the ball with his head and who came to another teammate who was in an offside position at the time of the pass and scored a goal. Correct decision of the second assistant referee to annul the goal due to offside position.

- On the match FC Bregalnica - FC Shkendija played on April 17, 2022, the situation from the 79th minute was analyzed.

Main referee: Stojance Trpcevski; Assistant referee: Dragan Trpcevski and Dushko Panov;

90th minute: Correct assessment of the referee (11-meter kick is not awarded).

A player from the attack of Shkendija was in the penalty area of ​​Bregalnica and centered, during the cross shot the ball hit the defender of the player of Bregalnica who was one meter away from the player of Shkendija and came out in the corner. Excellent cooperation between the referee and the first assistant, no playing with hand and properly awarded corner.

The Referee Commission reviewed the disputed moments from the 23rd round of the 2nd MFL West and East and made the following conclusions:

2 MFL - WEST:

On the match FC Vardar - FC Teteks played on 16.04.2022, the situations from the 22nd and 63rd minute were analyzed

Main referee : Blagojce Raleski; Assistant referee: Kostoski Zoran and Vladimir Mitrevski;

22nd minute: Good assessment of the referee (no penalty kick from 11 meters).

A player from the attack of Vardar receives a ball with his back turned towards a goal of Teteks, the player receives the ball badly and comes into minimal contact with a defender from Teteks who uses it to force a shot from 11 meters. Correct decision of the referee to continue the game, there are no elements for a shot from 11 meters.

63rd minute: Wrong assessment of the referee (awarded a penalty kick from 11 meters).

A player from the attack of Vardar is in possession of a ball a little behind the goal of Teteks, there is minimal contact with the defender of Teteks without intensity, which the attacker uses and exaggerates. Wrong decision of the referee who awarded an 11-meter kick.

On the match FC Sileks - FC Kadino played on 16.04.2022, the situation from the 17th minute was analyzed.

Main referee: Nikola Petkovski; Assistant referee: Aleksandar Gjurkovski and Stefan Petrovski;

17th minute: Good assessment of the second assistant referee (no offside position)

A centered ball in Kadino's box that comes to a player from the attack of Sileks. The moment the striker hits the ball and scores a goal, another of his teammates is in front of the goalkeeper and is in line with the penultimate player of Kadino. Correct decision of the second assistant, there is no offside position, the goal is regular.

On the match FC Besa - FC Ohrid played on April 16, 2022, the situations from the 75th and 80th minute were analyzed.

Main referee: Marjan Mladenovski; Assistant referee: Branko Putilin and Darko Vidinic;

75th minute: Good evaluation of the referee (second yellow / red card awarded)

A player from Besa's attack was in possession of a ball about 20 meters away from Ohrid's goal, a player from Ohrid's defense pulled the attacking player away, the same player after five meters deliberately tripped the attacker in front of the penalty area. Correct decision of the main referee for the disciplinary measure yellow card, it was also the second yellow (red) card.

80th minute: Good assessment of the referee (11-meter kick awarded)

A player from Besa's attack is in possession of a ball in the Ohrid penalty area centrally from the goal, the Ohrid goalkeeper starts on it, wanting to break the ball, but commits an offense and shoots down the attacker without playing with the ball. Correct decision of the referee, awarded a penalty kick from 11 meters with a yellow card for the goalkeeper.

On the match FC Korab - FC Velesta played on 16.04.2022, the situation from the 16th minute was analyzed.

Main referee: Bobi Velichkov; Assistant referee: Petar Novachev and Robert Crvenov;

16th minute: A player from Korab's attack is in possession of a ball sideways in the penalty area of ​​Velesta, a player from the defense of Velesta starts pushing on him from behind with great intensity. Correct decision of the referee, awarded a penalty kick from 11 meters without disciplinary measure.

2 MFL - EAST:

The refereeing commission made an analysis of the matches played from the 23rd round of the 2nd MFL EAST and concluded that there are no disputable situations for additional analysis.